The individual format, he explains, lets those students “explore many areas that would not be available through regular courses, and also to express their unique curiosity in a more fulfilling way.” It also offers a preview of what lies ahead: “The one-on-one format gives them more the experience of what graduate school will be like,” Peretz said, “where you tailor more closely your studies to your individual interests.”
Emery has seen firsthand what that close engagement can produce. During one tutorial, he worked with a student whose proposed project — vampire and gothic fiction — evolved over the semester into something far more expansive. Beginning with early nineteenth-century literature and moving through silent horror films, the student drew on readings across multiple languages, theoretical frameworks drawn from psychology, economics, and linguistics, and a close study of how cultural anxieties take on narrative form.
“The intellectual growth was phenomenal in all kinds of ways,” Emery said. The experience, he noted, also gave the student something more difficult to measure: confidence. “She grew as a writer, too … but the intellectual growth may be less important than the independence and confidence the student gained."
That confidence had real consequences. Emery was so impressed with the student’s development that he recruited her as a teaching assistant for IU’s Intensive First Year Seminar, a role in which she helped guide incoming students through some of the most challenging texts in the program.
“It’s really thanks to the Aleph Program that I was able to recruit her,” Emery said. “I might not have been able to fully appreciate her talent and initiative in a large class.”
Learning that radiates outward
The Aleph Program’s benefits, Emery argues, don’t stay contained within the tutorials themselves. When students who have done sustained independent research return to the regular classroom, the effects ripple outward.
“The research skills and sense of ownership they have over their learning help other students by example and raise the bar for everybody,” Emery said. “It’s inspiring for faculty, too — the energy is really infectious.”
The department hopes to expand the program until tutorials are available to any student who wants one, a shift that Emery believes will make senior capstone projects a standard feature of the undergraduate experience. For students planning to go on to graduate school, that means polished writing samples and a track record of independent scholarship.
But the program’s ambitions extend well beyond graduate school preparation.
“The experience of conceiving a complex project and doing the hard work to follow through on it is crucial for anything our students might want to do after College,” Emery said.
The department is also exploring ways to involve graduate students in the program, blurring what Emery calls an “artificial barrier” between the undergraduate and graduate communities. In many ways, he notes, the work Aleph students are already doing is graduate-level.
For students considering applying, Peretz describes an ideal candidate as “a budding academic in the making” who wants to experience what graduate study feels like, someone who relishes, “the challenge of a deepened intellectual exchange with a professor” around interests that might not find a home in the regular curriculum.
For Emery, the program ultimately reflects something essential about what draws students to Comparative Literature in the first place.
“Comp Lit isn’t the right path for everyone,” he said, “but students who would thrive in Comp Lit would tend to be the same students who would love to do a deep dive on something that uniquely fascinates them.”
In the Aleph Program, those students have a place to do exactly that.